Three reasons why I think the HP TouchPad will rock the tablet market
Yesterday, HP introduced the Touchpad, an iPad-like tablet device that is programmed with web technologies. While this certainly isn’t the first attempt of a vendor to compete with Apple on the tablet market, I am convinced the TouchPad is a true challenger to the iPad. There are three reasons why the TouchPad might be a real contender: the programming environment, the manufacturing process and security. HP is definitely doing something right. Never before has one single Tablet thrilled the interwebs as much as the TouchPad – except for the iPad, of course. Even die-hard Apple fans are thrilled.
Here’s why I think HP’s TouchPad will score a considerable market share:
- It’s programmed with web technologies like HTML, CSS and JavaScript. Don’t get me wrong – the iPad can also be programmed with web technologies: when the iPhone was first released and no one but Apple was allowed to write native apps, Steve himself told everyone that “mobile web applications are the future”. And despite the fact Apple has opened it’s SDK and we can now program the iPad / iPhone in Objective-C, many developers are more interested in writing apps with web technologies. Tools like PhoneGap and Appcelerator try to alleviate this situation, basically allowing you to wrap web code in more or less tiny wrapper apps so your web apps can be submitted to the App Store. However, most apps written using web technologies do not feel the same as real native apps on the iOS platform. So why do I think the situation will be better on the TouchPad? Well, because the TouchPad has been built for running web-based apps! It has been optimized for it. Web apps look stunningly great on the TouchPad. Now, every web developer can download the webOS SDK and get started writing apps for the TouchPad. It’s a safe bet to assume there are more web developers out there than Objective-C developers, so it shouldn’t take long until we’ve got a similar amount of apps for the TouchPad as we’ve got for the iPad.
- The manufacturing process. HP has a very powerful production pipeline, capable of pumping out high volumes of devices. In Q4/2010, they shipped 17.6 million PCs (Apple sold 7.33 million iPads in the same quarter). So if they are serious about it, it should be easy for HP to both produce and distribute high volumes of TouchPads.
- Security. When it comes to enterprise computing, security becomes a vital feature of your product. CIOs need to make sure to not compromise their company’s security by introducing products and devices that have no proper support for security mechanisms. There have always been security concerns with respect to the iOS platform: for a long time, there hasn’t been a way to nuke a lost iOS device remotely. It wasn’t before iOS 4 that Apple introduced data protection APIs to secure data that apps store on the device. WebOS has several security features built in (not bolted on later) which make it rather attractive for enterprise computing right from the start.
It’s my firm belief that the release of the HP TouchPad is a milestone for the perception of personal computing in the long run. It looks great, we’ll see tons of great apps for it in no time and HP as a major computer vendor has the power to push it to the market.
Good-bye, PC.
Thanks for reading this post. Follow me on twitter here to be notified about updates and other posts I write. Or, subscribe to my RSS feed here. If you want to get in touch with me, use the contact form.






I couldn’t agree more with statement #1. Unfortunately though, I agreed with it back when Palm first released WebOS and none of that really seemed to happen…
What do you think will make this time different?
I can see your second point about HP’s pipeline being a big help, but do you also see the tablet form factor being an important factor, making WebOS shine more than the Pre could?
I think the difference is best looked at like Saturn was to GMAC. Saturn was a small independent car maker with no real infrastructure or experience in distribution or sales for that matter. It was only when GMAC bought them that those things became secondary to Saturn and they were able to do what they did best, which was make great and innovative cars.
Similarly the WebOS team was kept intact and became a department within HP (by their own account). While there were recent changes very high up in HP, the WebOS section remained autonomous and put out a very slick product.
Now HP can do what they do best and sell it far and wide.
And for the record, HP is considered to be the largest PC manufacturer on the planet as of Q4 2010 according to Gartner Research, so I think that makes an extremely huge difference from when Palm was handling things by themselves.
I also wanted to say that you make a good point about the tablet form factor being significant compared to the Pre3. Yesterday I would have agreed with that completely but after reading for hours on end today, I’m starting to hear a lot more positive buzz from many corners about how great this Pre3 is looking.
It could very well be the spark that sends this whole thing through the roof for HP and the Touchpad.
…in a good way that is.
I hope WebOS wins out over both Android and iOS.
I love WebOS (and its web technologies), but I’m very skeptical about HP (bad track record of build quality, record low R&D spending, incredibly bad management for years). Nokia might have been a better buyer for Palm. I do hope that HP can make it work, summer is still months off.
Great analysis, but thought since it was HP, they would roll out a quad-core heavy hitter. I would love to see the Android Market conversion for this, it should help them add to the HP fanfare with those who are undecided about app availability.
I would love for HP to include an App that allows you clean its registry, cache, etc. to help with all the wear and tear its gonna endure. Hopefully the next HP Tablet gets upgraded with a 3D screen, 1TB HDD, a quad-core CPU and serious security features for the internet.
Nice blog,I really found it interesting.
This is my first visit on this site and i found a interesting article. Thanks for sharing and keep posting.
The problem with predictions on the internet is that they hang around for a long time
On the plus side, HP did rock the mobile world with the release of the HP Touchpad, but not in the way that you were thinking of …
That’s what I thought the other day… Well – maybe next time I’ll get it right. OTOH, in my talks I can now joke about the number of mobile platforms diminishing from day to day. If I’m bold, I might even try to predict which platforms remain at the end of the day….
I believe that the Touchpad is a very good device that was killed by poor marketing by HP. I’ve been using my new Touchpad (yes, waited like an idiot in line at BestBuy to get one of the handful that arrived the night before) for awhile and find WebOS much better than Android. It seems nearly as sleek as iOS but has good multitasking. WebOS may live on due to the hoards of fire sale Touchpad owners.
it has many features more than that thats the thing it will rock the world .galaxy
note 2 cases